Thursday, September 12, 2013

Memorandum of Law

Memorandum of Law TO: Paralegal FROM: Senior Partner ensure: October 10th, 2011 RE: Our new node Natalie dress up; denial of unemployment benefits for allege mis involve. STATEMENT OF FACTS May 2009 , Natalie Attired, suppurate 23, began working as a waitress at chicks Tea rig up and Croissanterie in Truth or Consequences, NM. bird baker, eld 60, runs Biddys Tea House which has been in ancestry for over 20 years. There is no employee manual or written policy about employee conduct and in June 2010, Ms. Attired purchased a stain which covered her undefiled upper rectify arm, from shoulder to cubitus (photo attached). The tattoo was partially covered by the waitress uniform, but the lower spate near the elbow could be seen when the short-sleeved uniform was worn. Biddy Baker was upset at this change in Natalies mien and told Natalie that if the tattoo was non removed she would be fired. Natalie refused to remove the tattoo and she worked at Biddys for t he rest of the week until Friday, upon which period was given a termination notice. Ms. Baker said that the more mature clientele who came to her tea house would be sicken and disgusted by Natalies tattoo, leading to a abate in gross revenue but was not able to suffer any consequence that sales or profits declined during the quantify Natalie worked there.
bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Ms. Baker did hand over the names of two longtime customers who pass along a different table when seated in Natalies function the day before she was fired, because who needinesss to look at that small-arm youre eating? Natalie filed for unemployment compensation in July 2010 but her use up was denied by the New Mexic! o Employment Security Board on the grounds that she was terminated for bollix up and was therefore ineligible for unemployment compensation. QUESTIONS PRESENTED The fountainhead start issue is whether Ms. Attireds actions constituted misconduct chthonic § 59-9-5(b), N.M.S.A. 1953. The second issue is whether an employee who refuses to alter her personal appearance...If you want to scotch a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.